[000:00:00;00] the, the, the perpetrators of last week terrorist attack in moscow received significant amounts of money and crippled currency from ukrainian nationalist, which was used in preparing to commit the atrocities. that's according to russia's investigative committee. turning on the charm, ukraine's foreign minister arrived in india, having previously long passed the country for its size with russia, the deli, those days, it's time for us to hold peaceful with us. we took the position from the stock that you're not going to get a solution for this conflict from the buttons on western representatives. once again,

the lock rushes request sprayed. un security council debate from the 25th anniversary of nato's military intervention in yugoslavia. the live across the world are run the clock, this is your r t international, and let's get to our top story of 1 am in most gold rushes investigative committee sees significant amounts of money. i'm crypto currency from ukrainian extreme. this was paid to the islamist perpetrators as of last friday is terrorist attack. in moscow, the initial results of the investigation fully confirmed the plan nature of the terrorist actions, careful preparation and financial support from the organizers of the crime. the investigation has confirmed data on the income of significant amounts of money and crypto currencies from ukraine to the perpetrators of the terrorist attack,

which were used in the preparation of the crime. as you were hearing just a moment ago, this is the information that we've just had from the russian investigative committee. it's pretty big. they're saying that they have substantial evidence that ukraine was involved in the attacks last week. a crow christopher, the whole, they have a link to be attacked as killed a $143.00 individuals and left hundreds more interested in the attack at 2 ukrainian nationals. they say they say that they significant evidence the money inconclusive card seen. we use to funding the attack before it happens. and base, of course, is coming of the fact we've had claims previously from the head of the russian fs. b dot ukraine has links to these attack is this have a listen to he has said previously students to 0, and that was the way, what did you try and supposedly need to do to prove its was committed sabotage and

terrorist attacks. that's what the ukraine security services and the british security services have claimed. oddly enough, the americans, i've also spoken about this repeatedly on those. why didn't you specify the yes, the you tell you and ukraine, those 3 countries were behind the terrorist attack. a 2nd source you while i think so we are currently talking about the findings that we have and there. awesome general developments. this is a jigsaw puzzle and adds to that puzzle. we already know that those attack is apprehended. just do a fleeing most go through app for him to diamond brown screeching, which is close to you quite. and that is evidence coming out from the speech that they were looking to head into crane, but they have contacts that and they were hoping for window to be open so that they could cross the border. but also say this is dick. so the latest piece of puzzle we've had today is from the russian investigative committee saying that there was substantial evidence that the currency was funded from ukraine to the attack is on the face. and use that for me to fax tara attack in most cases,

to try to can i just touching on washington in all this, it keeps insisting key of authorities had no involvement, no awareness of this attack, what's being said. and how does this information relate to that? not yeah, that's why it wasn't very long off though we was seeing what was happening occurred because city hold. we had a statement from white house saying ukraine was not involved in this attack that really quick off the law in denying that also say that not involved. and we've heard that line over and over, not just from washington, but from other lessons of the size of the last 7 days. we've also had that reiterated fi, matthew mila, who's this works best for the us state department. once again saying ukraine is not in full, it's clear that these claims are categorically false. ukraine was a behind these attacks. the u. k. was behind these attacks the united states was and by these docs, in fact,

the united states warned russia about the possibility of these attacks. well, let's just pick up. all them is warnings for a 2nd. there's warnings came at the beginning of march. it was basically the embassy website, the us telling the citizens to leave the u. k. website said something very similar, and they have set the americans that they pass all this information to the 1st page of success be said, well, actually what you gave us was very known. concrete happened to say it was quite general knowledge, essentially wishy washy. nothing really that they could act on as a result of that. now we've also had a response from the russian performance to maria. so how did bus 2 will seem villa and to the us as continues to say in terms of that idea, they say ukraine was no of the list is listed, but then the white house, along with the state department, has stated that ukraine has nothing to do with the tara attack on what data and what information did they draw such a conclusion? it's completely unclear. any one thing is obvious,

that washington started to whitewash the key of regime to whitewash themselves. because everyone understands that there is no sound to learn key of regime without west and military support and western funding that don't forget, this is an incredibly complex investigation, an investigation. the russian authorities are conducting who, on the grounds, that the ones with the evidence that the ones piecing this possible together on. i think it's easy to forget sometimes that western governments can make all the sessions that they want to put a note here. nope, fisting through the material and working out exactly what's going on and that's exactly what we know. russian authorities wants views because they want to know that they holding the white people accountable for this horrific attack instead place to task if he is a place in russia. charlotte davinsky talking us through that. meanwhile, a spokes person for the ruling party inter kia has claimed last week's terror

attack. and moscow could not have happened without the involvement of foreign powers or russian authorities previously said, western special services had some complicity in the atrocity. a 100 and there's nothing this doesn't happen without support from any states intelligence activities or from several states, whatever that is. this is not an organization that i say sold a like can do alone. but ultimately, i'm not saying we agree with the address. russia has shown, but it's true that there must be a sponsor, uninitiated, for subtractions, spokes person. i'm not sure they issued a statement issued a number of interesting facts and a television interview. he says that unpleasant since it has inspected the footage and suggests that the perpetrators of this attack were professionally trained and that this could not have happened without some sort of pre planned motives. and the reason why uncle is currently involved in this case is because at least 2 of the gunmen were believed to have visited it to our care days, or if not weeks before the attack. and this is

a matter of concern for uncle as much as it is for moscow, which is why the spokesman has been quite vocal and adamant in his position towards the matter. what else is, of course he says that the tensions in the region are escalating any post, a rhetorical question, who benefits? and this is, of course, a question of great concern for on cry. because in this, according to the spokesman, he says that the number of things that need to be evaluated here, of course, who benefits, could it be a group? could it be a number of groups? was a state sponsored? is it not? but more importantly, what he said was, it could also be another group that is beaming to redirect and much of the focusing attention to serial related conflicts. and in this sense, of course, the spokesman was referring to isis. he did not specifically say that the united states was involved, but he didn't see any way that the united states would best benefit from an, an issue in this scenario like this. of course, this is also in line with washington's position on the matter as well. washington says that chip was not involved that it was isis,

whereas moscow's position and according to the investigation committee, suggestively that ukrainian nationalists were in fact involved in the attacks carried out by these perpetrators that onto this position is more important here in the sense that they're also competing terrorist activities, and that has been the general consensus between the turkish and russian presidents and based on all of the facts and at least the allegations at this point coming out, it suggests that there could have been someone behind these attacks. and, entre moscow will work closer together than ever before. the new york times has been speculating on the part in feelings by moscow security services accusing rush of trying to pin the blame on ukraine for the culture, the atrocity of the same time, the same article points. i felt the u. s. without certain specific information about the plot, quote, i just fear russian authorities might learn their intelligence sources or methods.

russians f. s b had also confirmed that the information provided was all the general nature. the whitehouse, whoever insist otherwise used to say that the best in the nor salesman, often carriers samples in the maps, russian officials seem to be pretty good been horses. there are no such profits in russian because they carry menu or in their mouth, not here but overseas. but there is all saying, whoever hurts talks about it. by the way, it now becomes clear why the expression to wash one's mouth out with soap is common in the states. well we can cross live now to washington dc and to john cardiac a host of the whistle blower show which you can watch right here on our t. um former us intelligence officer john s. thank you for your time today. thank you. the new york times is reporting there that the us didn't disclose to russia all it knew about the potential attack,

fearing it would reveal to moscowitz intelligence method does keeping your tactics under wraps justify failing to offer potentially life saving intel for, for close to a 150 people, now that, you know, that's an easy one. the answer's no. the way that the c i a does, this is a create something called a tear line, where they'll take the raw intelligence. so boil it down to the very bare, essential, both the central information so that it's impossible to point back to its original sourcing. and they'll literally tear it off along the line and give it to, in this case, the russian government. we now know that that's simply was not enough information that it wasn't actionable. the russians couldn't do anything with the information. so what is more important? is it more important that the russians not know that this was, let's say,

a telephone intercept, or that they have a source inside isis. k. i would say no, not when there are a 150 lives at stake. this was a terrible mistake. terrible. the spokes person for the us department of state speaking during a daily briefing said that washington warden, russia of the terror attack in advance. providing clear and detailed information, he said, pointing, i thought it could happen during a concert, but must be miller. didn't confirm or deny the the new york times article claims. you're taking his reaction. i know matthew miller, i've known him for many years. he is a he is a died in the will washington political heck. he made his, his career with attorney general eric holder, and then later on with the, with the senate foreign relations committee and with tony blinking, matthew miller will say whatever he's instructed to say, that's how he has succeeded for so long in washington. that's why he'll continue to

succeed in washington. i think we should take everything that matthew miller says with a or with a grain of salt. i just don't think we can. we can believe him. v us is rubbishing possible ukrainian involvement. but western media outlets themselves have previously given examples of when at george, in based estimate sled to ukraine, with a fake passports, they weren't deported. they weren't in prison due to corruption and even flooded more attacks from there. people can read about it in an independent article from 2019 with thoughts in mind at john why, when the attackers were moving some of them in the direction of ukraine after what they did? is it so be all the impossibility best? there may indeed be links there. oh no, no i, i listen. i think that would that we should, we should go where the evidence points and the evidence is pointing to crate. know,

does the evidence say there was official involvement if you creating government? not yet, but it's worthy of investigation there. there's a reason why these attackers were not suicide bombers, which has been the norm in the past. there is a reason why they were fleeing in the direction of ukraine. and i think that, that the russian government has every right in the world to investigate these questions and to get to the bottom of this, i wouldn't, i wouldn't close the door on any us media. also, sites at western base sources including n g o is with the history of empty moscow rhetoric, who say russian authorities fail to act on the information the us provide the best, the thing blaming most skillful. what happened? first of all, how would they know that must go down, react on high credible? are the sources?

ok, that's a great question. either they have may be information up, or the us government has leaked the information to them and i'll go farther. if the information was d classified to the point where the us government felt comfortable turning it over to the russian government, then why not release it to the public so that we can make our own decision? why not say this is what we gave the russian government so we can see if the state department is lying, that the information they turned over was indeed actionable. i would bet my next paycheck that it was not actionable. me. there's a lot of open questions here. can i put one of them to you as well? well, try to explain that the, the possibility of ice is isis k, whatever, a rather cold muslim group planning this attack while russia is one of the few states at world wide eyed side this nomic world who,

who openly is supporting gaza. and i'm trying to stop the war there is this has not only taken part in not major conflict in the middle east. so it begs the question, why would they put their efforts into attacking a nation such as russia, you know, i can only think of 2 reasons. one would be, uh, because of the heat tread that isis because for the us side government in syria and the fact that russia and the syrian government are allies, that that would be number one, number 2, sometimes these attacks are irrational. sometimes they are attacks of opportunity and you know, it was my, my own personal experience with a kind of fighters, but they had no personal problem with the united states. they just had nothing better to do. and outside i had offered them money to go to afghanistan to meet you, how to get to the americans. i wonder if in this case, these techniques were just a handful of idiots who had nothing better to do with their lives. they were poor

and they were convinced that this was something that was worth doing. maybe even if it was just for money, i would say that somewhere in between those $2.00 answers probably lies the truth. and just finally do. do you feel as if they, they were paid by, by outside influence to do that that, that the actual religious ferocity watson great. that money was the overriding factor at play here? i do believe that i believe that because they did not murder themselves and you know, the ultimate goal is to go to heaven and collect your 70 versions and to live at the right hand of god. and that's not what these men did. these men murdered, wholesale, murdered civilians, the innocent people who are just going about their normal lives and enjoying the evening. and then they fled like cowards. and so i think that the motivation

probably was money rather than religion or ideology. yeah, the question is, where did it come from? not about it is the investigation as it goes forward. john, thanks very much for your time. always enjoy speaking to and thank you for coming in the program. john curry, aka, of hosting of the whistle blowers on former c. i a officer. okay. and barking on a 2 day let's call a charm offensive. kias foreign minister has arrived in india. it's being widely seen as an attempt to win over new delhi, which has remain neutral in the ukrainian conflict. but the indian foreign minister has urge peace negotiations with russia stating that the crisis cannot be result on the buffalo ortiz ranging charlotte reports. this is for the 1st time that you're talking ukrainian official is visiting india after the war. new queen started war 2 years ago as the queen for ministers here for to day was it today and tomorrow he's going to be meeting with his scouts fargo for ation car. also the deputy odyssey,

why don't be for the agenda really sees that he's here to talk about why mattress box to ship also cooperation in regional and global issues. what really, what exports believe is that the you critical for shalysea to be for renewal support in the upcoming b stokes that will take place in switzerland. lita, in the summer. now it's clear that after all the criticism that you create have for india, it looks like you, queen has realized that if there's anybody who can broke up fees in this conflict, it is india also that russia has an upper hand in the war. and for now it needs india who has remember, close song ties with moscow to influence them to talk beasley. i'm like the west that has always fixated on using arms and ammunition and this conflict. india has always maintained a peaceful resolution,

as it won't be possible to dialogue on diplomacy. we took the position from the stock to, to a not going to get a solution for this conflict on the back to 52 years have passed of the many wholesale it 2 years ago or so met in between. that may be the quote, i think today, many of them don't any longer. if one sees, you know, in this day and age, what conflicts bring that are actually no windows or clock? nothing deals for the policy in defending for the policy of neutrality. in the i remember from the very beginning of the russia you clean conflict said that india is not going to take sides. india is going to be neutral. now despite the west pressure, rising india to got styles with the most cool, what india did was india student by it's old friend,

the trade between the 2 countries. india and russia has only gone off. that's oh boy hill with the west was the, the west have problems with india buying more than more oil from moscow. but india said that india will do what suits india. the best is 5 sections. and despite the traditional, we'd be doing business soon, we india found solutions in india continue to buy more motor. what had we not student grown about buying energy from russia? very frankly, all of you would be paying much more for your energy because we would have more countries would have gone into a natural set of suppliers. and actually these, the was the energy prices. so if i looked at it from the perspective of the global economy, and frankly, obviously from my own perspective, we actually did that, i think. so this ability to think for yourself to be comfortable with your identity,

to be proud of your civilization, to be, to be appreciative of your own history. i never remember india, i had thoughts. we both the ukraine as well as last year, and this off to the russian president was re elected so week ago, the prime minister to india. and that means and what will the he died almost school . he in fact had a ward with food. then he also had a word we've done with the ukranian now president, and as far as talk officials and the government of india atkinson, they have confirmed to me that prime minister in the range and will be, has been invited by both sides to wizard fact on please, respectively, all still the elections in india, so the results of indian elections are going to come in 1st week of june. so sometime after that, india is invited in both countries. why the house? because slowly it's being made very clear that if somebody has the pablo to broke up is easy is india because it has maintained its relationship with moscow?

that's remember west did not want. so becoming really clear of, by the way, that if there is a country in the world, that is a piece, meek or a stabilizing force globally, that is in there, just to add to engines peace. the russia recently became in the top supplier of crude oil acc, hunting for a full 3rd of the countries total imports. exporting $1800000.00 barrels per day. it's the highest volume since july last year. not that trade has simply be totally unaffected by western sections, which includes a price cap and russian or the shipments. now, since the beginning of the print conflict, new daily house has started its right to trade with moscow on this month so far because it's not over. its purchase of russian crude has already increased by 2 percent from february, month on month. that trade has been a particular bug, bare for ukraine, with the country's foreign minister,

previously accusing india of having blood on the 10th every barrel of russian crude oil delivered to india has a good portion of ukrainian blood in it. if your benefits, because of both, i'll stop by, it won't be good to see more of your help address to us. it's not enough just to point figure, it'd be repeating union and say, oh they're, they're doing the same thing. well have relations with dally, we're already on rocky foundations. let's go through that. because some months ago, a ukrainian presidential adviser claimed india and china of quote, weak intellectual potential. the remark provoked an indian diplomat to question his country's future re, to ukraine. any training in defense ministry, you may recall posted the photo patrina into gold as in what some of described as a disrespectful and mocking monarch kid was forced to issue an apology. we took to the streets of the indian capital, get reaction of the visit by kids top different on say well on this,

but the thing in the, as that the, the things to take care of. i am not available, but i think i can get you to enjoy is a very close and i also show suite. so initially, much more, more focused on this. you then you can do, you know, you can find ministers in yesterday. sorry. i don't know easy by the way, use the same for some of the tools, say the india has a low intellectual pretension. is the same person. yeah. quite a ways you have to delete those lawyers and look through people today. no, i don't think so. why should the india pay attention to such people who have this kind of sense to say, i want to bring you this story as well. western representatives on the un security card, so have once again lock rushes request to discuss next to it was 1999 military intervention in you can slide the most cool head salt the hub of the page on the 25 year

anniversary of the military alliance. is foaming campaign. russia's deputy embosser to be un cold to move a serious blow to the organizations reputation. such a name. so we regret that the council has been dragged into an extremely unpleasant situation at the behest of the western troy. as also, in fact, it is just refused to discuss an item on its agenda, on the maintenance of international peace and security. that is essentially the members of the security council have refused to fulfill their mandate. and this is an extremely serious blow to the reputation of our body, france, britain and the united states have sacrificed it for their own self interest. by any means necessary to prevent the discussion on this platform of the issue of nato's illegitimate aggression against the sovereign state of yugoslavia. but i hasten to disappoint you. what else you can buy procedural manipulation?

block one or even 2 meetings of the un security council. that alone will not erase the consequences of your destructive actions, but those thousands of dead and maimed civilians. territories poisoned by depleted uranium, coupled with an explosive rise in the number of cancer diseases that will hound. according to experts, estimates the next 60 generations of the bulk and population of the hot spot in the center of europe, created by nato's hand, which will not fade away and which threatens to explode again at any moment. well, essentially we had western countries on the un security council blocking the discussion of what happened in the former yugoslavia. now, the russian representative made clear that this was because western leaders did not want the world to be reminded of the outrages pre taxes upon which these interventions were carried out. and they also did not want there to be any

discussion that would show the negative implications of nato and its activities. now, it's worth noting that china also spoke. i've been expressed of disappointments and said that these are the kinds of issues is that the un security council should be discussing and that this was only a meeting that was to take place. this was not a binding resolution. this was not a statement on behalf of the security council. this was just a meeting to discuss a military intervention and its consequences. however, it was blocked now the russian representative said that this points to an em balance because the majority of the members of the security council, the 15 member body that leads the united nations, the majority of countries represented on it at this time, had no problem with this meeting, taking place, but western countries with their retail bower were able to prevent any discussion. so that caused a lot of outrage. we heard both russia and china expressing disappointment and

saying that these kinds of issues, military interventions and their results, the pre text under which they are weighed using the very kinds of issues that the united nations security council should be discussing with russian federal. we also got to take on this from european studies scholar dr. stephan guide speaking to us from bell. great. he says western countries aren't ready to accept their part in nature's bombardment of serbia because they know it was a war crime. they panicked, they are so much afraid of dimension on the war crimes that they have committed and the original cry, which is a crime like against these and the crime against international uh, the whole point of what we see, what we are seeing today goes back to everything goes back to 1999 when without the resolution, without any kind of a legal basis. natal of fact i have committed aggression and war crimes

against the sovereign country, which is federal republic of yugoslavia at the time. so if this is the question, then the whole point of nate to basically physically occupying serbia in southern province are possible. and the thought here comes the question and also their, their policy as such because the original crime is crime against the fees. and it was commissioned by may thought by breaking international law as by to me, 3 large men. so even today, every that of ukrainian war is in one way or the other victim of bates because a lot of, and policy and radio international law was it brought us to today's moment. now it is among the most dangerous occupations on the planet right now, but those who do it say it's also among the most rewarding, despite the little jeopardy. next, we follow